William Thien

Archive for March 2013

I am currently reading a book titled Those Dirty Rotten TAXES, The TAX REVOLTS that BUILT AMERICA, written by Charles Adams, published by The Free Press, a Division of Simon & Schuster Incorporated. I highly recommend the book. Were I a book reviewer I’d give it five stars. The book is available at bookstores and online.

In the book Adams discusses the five main tax revolts in the history of The United States. It’s fascinating reading and the book demonstrates some of the necessary mechanics required in a tax revolt.

Adams describes the variety of tax revolts and how the citizenry viewed various taxes in the day. The country’s founding fathers long after the formation of The United States often and generally referred to taxes as “legalized theft.” And they were really often only talking about a few pennies. Perhaps they’d be turning in their graves if they knew what we pay today.

I would like to compliment Mr. Adams and The Free Press and Simon & Schuster Incorporated on such a fascinating book.

William Thien

Advertisements

Here is a Government Waste List compiled by the NRCC.

To me the list seems rather limited, but it is a start. Not listed are social programs and entitlements which clearly are a waste and/or subject to massive abuse as well. This list merely is a list of the obvious and really least expensive. Programs that are unfair, such as those which I call “Selectively Communist” (in that many pay for the programs but are ineligible for benefits), such as many health programs, clearly are waste, unfair, and should be dealt with directly. But they are not on the list.

Several of the entries on the list are particularly disturbing as they total in the billions of dollars.

Have a look at The Government Waste List.

You will be glad you did.

Copyright © William Thien 2013

Sign up to receive updates. It’s easy and safe. Just go to the upper right hand corner of this page and add your email address.

Recently I had a conversation with a colleague on the subject of tax deductions. The conversation meandered from one deduction to another and then proceeded to the topic of The Dependent Child Tax Deduction. He also being a single tax payer, I asked him what he thought about the deduction? His reply was the standard fare for someone who might have designs on a political career or in other words was basically afraid to speak what he actually thought, so he said he thought that the deduction and any such tax assistance which helped families were a good thing. Personally, I didn’t believe he actually thought that for a second. Others were listening and he was well aware of that fact. Who can disagree, I thought to myself? Families need help. It sounds great. Who would hurt families?

It’s a bogus deduction, really, as the deduction is merely a redistribution of wealth. As I myself have stated though, I don’t have a problem with the deduction, being single and not eligible to take it. And agreed, any tax assistance families can get is a good thing. The problem is that “families” to me are composed of a mother, father, and children. But nearly half of all children born today (41% in 2011) are born to single mothers (not single fathers, by the way, but single mothers). And you know what? Single mothers also take the dependent child tax deduction. So, a tax deduction meant to help families, families by definition having a mother, father, and children is being used by single women, single mothers who are not married and don’t even have any children, yet! No family there to begin with, just a woman having sex who want’s to get pregnant really, perhaps so she herself can then be eligible for medical benefits for the duration of the child’s life through adolescence. Otherwise birth control would have been involved in the sexual ordeal. Would it not? Of course she would have used birth control if she didn’t want to have a child. It’s everywhere. They give contraceptives away free all over the place, even in schools! Yes, that’s right! People are popping babies out everywhere left and right at your expense and your only defense against the cost of it is to offer free contraceptives everywhere?! Get rid of the damn tax breaks! Come on people!

Now, not only are single people and those who have not had children, not only are they paying for the dependent child tax deduction for families, they are paying for single women, often only girls really having children out-of-wedlock as well, women who just a few short years ago would have been called a few unsavory names. The dependent child tax deduction is therefore by default, discriminatory. Yes, single fathers are probably taking it. But how often really does that happen? It’s a statistical anomaly, I’m sure. So, as a matter of numbers, the deduction is by definition sexually discriminatory. Well, you might say, men are not supposed to complain about that type of thing, only women. OK. Let’s move on now that I’ve made the observation. We can always come back to it.

My original premise on the topic of the dependent child tax deduction dealt with the unfairness of the tax to single people and empty nesters or those who are married and have never had children, but the realization that single women are using the tax deduction as well reveals that the tax is even more unfair and indicates that particular portion of the tax code is ineffective and is probably often being used to pay for the result of a night of illicit sex, seemingly in perpetuity. Yes, single women have sex, too. And you know what? They get pregnant! And once again, in 2011 forty-one percent of the children born were born to single females. Nearly half! That has to be costly in terms of government support and taxes as all of those women can’t afford to raise a child through term and continue to work without some form of assistance. I wonder in fact how many of them receive government (that’s taxpayer, by the way) support. I’d wager it is close to 100 percent that receive some form or another at one time or another.

To continue on the matter of the deduction indicating an ineffective tax code, families generally use more government services by default, sending children to public schools or getting school vouchers, using socialized medicine more frequently, you name it. But instead of billing families for use of those services, they are given a tax break in the form of the dependent child deduction while using the services no less, and the bill is passed on to another segment of society, single people, statistically to single men in particular as forty-one percent of the single women are getting pregnant. Do the math! The result is that there isn’t enough money to fix the roads or improve schools when needed because there are not enough single men to pay for all of the families and the nights of illicit sex had by single women (who just a short while ago were again called worse) who want to get pregnant and have a child out-of-wedlock and thus receive the tax break.

Politicians, instead of addressing the reality of a screwed up tax code (no pun intended but it works, doesn’t it?) for fear of not getting re-elected, simply attempt to cut school budgets again and again and let the roads go until you feel like you are driving on a road in a third world country. Afraid to cut social programs and tax breaks for women having children out-of-wedlock for fear of being labeled “anti-baby” by the media or for simply angering the media which make massive profits from single mothers sitting at home in front of the television, politicians don’t fix the dysfunctional tax code, which results in massive government debt and inevitable tax increases for everyone because a hoard of single women wanted to have sex and now the system says, “Hey, you want to screw around and get pregnant? We got a bunch of suckers who are forced to pay for it!”

Why did I pick that particular deduction to examine so thoroughly? The dependent child tax deduction is one that is most often used and so everyone has an idea of what it is and it makes a great follow through into the subject of deductions available within the tax code. The tax code is full of such deductions for many other things, for merely doing one type of business or another. The tax code is a sham. And what’s worse, as long as we continue to validate such deductions as the dependent child tax deduction, something even single women (not families) take as a result of the product of a night of illicit sex, the other truly unfair deductions and loopholes will remain. Ultimately, with regard to the dependent child tax deduction people are getting a tax deduction for the product of SEX! Yes, ladies and gentlemen, that’s how children are made!

I am sure there is someone out there, perhaps many, saying, “Oh, you can handle it. Yer a guy. Buck up!” OK. I have been doing just that.

What to do? What to do!

Where do I stand on this issue, then? I’m for lowering the general tax rates across the board and getting rid of the loopholes as much as possible and deductions across the board for everyone, corporations included, because the deductions unfairly strap particular segments of the population with the product of sex. That is exactly what the deduction does. It makes others pay for the result of someone’s sexual behavior.

Simple as that…

Copyright © William Thien 2013

Sign up to receive updates. It’s easy and safe. Just go to the upper right hand corner of this page and add your email address.

Posted on: March 24, 2013

Forty-One Percent of Children are born to unwed mothers today and a predominance of those unwed mothers, often just girls, receive substantial government assistance.

William Thien

Here is an interesting if not discomforting statistic. Forty-one percent of all children born in 2011 were born to unwed mothers in The United States. That’s nearly half of all children born in 2011! That number signifies big government by definition as single mothers en masse simply cannot all pay for all of the medical expenses associated with bearing a child nor can they afford to pay for the daycare (daycare is expensive) associated with raising a child after they return to work, if in fact they are working. Somebody has to pick up the tab for the result of all of that illicit sex. The cost of so many pregnancies to unwed mothers is a tremendous burden to the taxpayer.

For more information see BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN.

I have said it before, Down with The F&#k and Suck Economy!

Copyright © William Thien 2013

Sign up to receive…

View original post 21 more words

It is time to replace Amendment Sixteen of The U.S. Constitution and replace it with a Balanced Budget Amendment.

Amendment Sixteen is the “Income Tax” amendment which enables the levy of taxes on income. Enacted in 1913 the amendment enables the federal government to tax income in an almost arbitrary manner to pay for anything the government deems necessary. Prior to the income tax amendment the government raised revenues via tariffs (customs duties) and excise taxes. The founding fathers felt income taxes were more injurious to the tax payer than excise or customs taxes and so fought against income taxes.

You might say, well how will we as a country pay our bills if we can’t levy taxes when needed? We can do so by creating a balanced budget amendment. Many states required their legislatures to balance their budgets, why not the federal government?

Americans will not see any substantial and permanent improvement in their tax rates until Amendment Sixteen is abolished.

Copyright © William Thien 2013

Sign up to receive updates. It’s easy and safe. Just go to the upper right hand corner of this page and add your email address.

Without ending The Sixteenth Amendment it is unlikely Americans will ever see an improving tax situation.

William Thien

Amendment Sixteen is the “Income Tax” amendment which enables the levy of taxes on income. Enacted in 1913 the amendment enables the federal government to tax income in an almost arbitrary manner to pay for anything the government deems necessary. Prior to the income tax amendment the government raised revenues via tariffs (customs duties) and excise taxes. The founding fathers felt income taxes were more injurious to the tax payer than excise or customs taxes and so fought against them.

Here is the text of The Sixteenth Amendment:

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

Clearly the text of The Sixteenth Amendment indicates such income taxation is arbitrarily determined based on Congressional whim.

It is my belief that the income tax is ruining the country’s small business…

View original post 482 more words

Amendment Sixteen is the “Income Tax” amendment which enables the levy of taxes on income. Enacted in 1913 the amendment enables the federal government to tax income in an almost arbitrary manner to pay for anything the government deems necessary. Prior to the income tax amendment the government raised revenues via tariffs (customs duties) and excise taxes. The founding fathers felt income taxes were more injurious to the tax payer than excise or customs taxes and so fought against them.

Here is the text of The Sixteenth Amendment:

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

Clearly the text of The Sixteenth Amendment indicates such income taxation is arbitrarily determined based on Congressional whim.

It is my belief that the income tax is ruining the country’s small business climate as it has steadily increased over the last eighty years from under five percent for most to often now reaching into the thirtieth percentile. Since the income is taken from your weekly or periodic pay you do not have that discretionary income left (off it has gone to the government) to purchase small ticket items at the store which are made in the United States, where it often costs more to manufacture such items than Asia, for example, where the cost of labor is lower. Since you have less income due to the income tax you cannot afford “Made in America.” The gross effect is then that the income tax destroys American Industry. Small ticket items manufacturing is the bread and butter of American business as you purchase such items on a regular basis with receipt of your weekly pay, rather than a car or a house, for example. I’ve blogged on this in the past, click here to read the essay ==> Income Taxes: Serial Killer of American Small Business.

Let’s do some basic math on the matter. If for example you made $1,000 a month in pay and your income tax was five percent (wow, that would be nice), your tax would be $50.00. But if your income tax on the same pay is twenty-five percent, you are taking home $750.00 instead of $950.00. That $200.00 a month is going directly to the federal government, perhaps for you on a bi-weekly basis! For what! What do you get really!? Nothing that benefits you in the long term in terms of property or rights. Nothing! With that $200.00 you could build your savings, buy a new car, you name it. But instead it is going to the federal government. What do you get for that $200.00 from the federal government? Over the last thirty or forty years you have seen an incredible attack on your rights to privacy and property with all manner of changes regarding search and seizure and surveillance of Americans. You are now a suspect, did you know that!

The income tax has many, many negative effects on Americans. The income tax undermines small business and industry, it effects people’s savings as they have less to set aside (it’s going to the government instead), it forces people to buy on credit more causing massive financial distress, and it allows foreign producers where labor is less expensive to overcome American industry.

It is time to abolish The Sixteenth Amendment! It is destroying America!

I’ve often thought what should The Sixteenth Amendment be replaced with? How about a Balanced Budget Amendment that requires Congress to keep its house in order instead of increasing income taxes when things get tough.

Copyright © William Thien 2013

Sign up to receive updates. It’s easy and safe. Just go to the upper right hand corner of this page and add your email address.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Find by month

Find by date

March 2013
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Follow William Thien on WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: