William Thien

Archive for April 2014

It is my opinion that one of the reasons for any drive whatsoever for socialized medicine in The United States is that there is a general consensus that perhaps the profit motive and health care don’t make for the most successful marriage.

As an example, I have heard people say they believe cures for certain diseases are not sought because it is more profitable to treat the disease as a condition in perpetuity rather than cure the disease with perhaps a vaccination.

I must admit, given the massive profits some portions of the health care industry obtain regularly, the pharmaceutical industry for example, that sentiment is not that outlandish. Furthermore, corporate law which governs the behavior of said corporations states explicitly that corporations must act always in the best interest of their shareholders. If a corporation knows that it has the cure for a disease and also has a drug which can treat a disease more profitably in perpetuity, the law says in effect that the corporation must suppress the cure for the sake of profit. Then, add human nature to that equation and it is almost certain some diseases will never see a cure. Do the math!

But am I focusing too thoroughly on the darker side of human nature?

Though government health care probably is not the best solution in all respects, it may be that if the government were responsible in certain circumstances such as it becomes during times of pandemic or worse, or if there were a drive throughout the nation to cure certain diseases which involved everyone, either through taxation or some other levy, such as a form of conscription for a time of service to the health care profession much like a draft to the military, you would at least see a common goal to cure certain diseases that could be orchestrated or directed at the national level instead of inside of some corporate board room where a cure could just as easily vanish with a vote by the most prominent shareholders, files from drug trials shredded with a phone call, samples of the vaccine incinerated, another cure vanished forever.

Greed is a driving force behind much of the business sector. But should greed be a component of the health care industry? Because the hand of greed is not a hand at all, often it is a clicking, clawing thing. Should the nation’s health then be always potentially subject to that claw of greed?

With so much potential in medical science and so many diseases going without cures, so many laws preventing self-treatment, so much regulation of life, regulation of life itself, you have to ask yourself if death AND discomfort have not themselves been incorporated into our health care system for the sake of profit? I think many would answer unequivocally that the answer is yes.

Though I do not truly favor socialized medicine, I see the reason for a belief in its potential.

Copyright © William Thien 2014

Sign up to receive updates. It’s easy and safe. Just go to the upper right hand corner of this page and add your email address.

If you examine who benefits the most from America’s tax code, I think you could conclude that it needs to be “cleaned up.”

So many corporate tax breaks and other tax maneuvers for all kinds of special interests, not to mention the dependent tax deduction, demonstrate that the tax code is unfair across the board and needs to be cleaned up.

A working stiff with a family of four shouldn’t need to contact an accountant or even a tax preparer to have his taxes done. But if both parents are working and own their own home, that is likely the case these days.

But politicians make promises to special cross sections of the population that they know will vote for them if they promise certain tax breaks. It’s dirty politics in a sense in that some segments of the population are eligible for the tax breaks while others are not. Dirty politics have led to a “dirty tax code.”

The tax code IS dirty and it is time it is cleaned up so that it benefits everyone equally and does not only favor special interests or certain marital arrangements.

That is why I believe a flat tax is the most fair. Everyone would be equally invested in seeing that the tax rate is held in check and that the dispersal of taxes levied is fair.

As it is today, one group does not care about the other and doesn’t mind if one group gets saddled with the tax burdens derived from the behaviors of the others.

The next candidate that comes out in favor of a flatter, more fair tax code will definitely get my consideration.

Copyright © William Thien 2014

Sign up to receive updates. It’s easy and safe. Just go to the upper right hand corner of this page and add your email address.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Find by month

Find by date

April 2014
Follow William Thien on WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: